by John Sadden
On the 75th anniversary of the release of one of the best British films of the 20th century, we take a look at the school career and life of a campaigning Old Portmuthian who wrote the source novel.
The anonymous critic did not mince his words in his review of a school production of scenes from Corneille’s Horace in October, 1884. “The great defect was that the actors scarcely seemed to appreciate the spirit of the play, the accompanying gesture was weak and often inappropriate”. The fact that the script was in French, the actors were fifteen-year-old boys, and that some were in drag clearly cut no ice. “Most of the performers seemed to lack the true dramatic fire.”
The critic, probably a teacher at the end of a long day, searched for something positive to say. The make-up of the female characters was “particularly effective”. And, not least, and without any more hints of barrel-scraping, “the best piece of acting by far was R. Horniman’s representation of the Roman warrior Valère; his long speech of thirty lines was delivered unhesitatingly and with unfaltering accent”.
Roy Horniman was a restless spirit. Born in 1868, he ran away
from home and roamed the Continent with an Italian circus, before being
recovered by his parents and enrolled at the Portsmouth Grammar School in 1883.
His father was William Horniman, Paymaster in Chief for the Royal Navy, whose
career had brought him to Britain’s premier naval port from Hastings. Sarah,
Roy’s mother, was said to be a member of the Greek aristocracy, though this did
not prevent the family settling down in Cottage Grove, Southsea.
The household bustled with six children, one mother-in-law and one overworked domestic servant. Roy’s younger brothers, Benjamin and Charles, were to follow him into the school. For the son of a paymaster, Roy’s mathematical abilities were poor but it was clear from an early age that he was not going to follow in his father’s nautical wake. The boy’s strengths were theatrical, linguistic and literary, and he put himself forward as an editor of The Portsmuthian (the Port was plural in those days). There were four applicants for the post and Horniman secured 52 pupil votes, coming second.
The outcome must have been a disappointment, but the number of
votes Horniman received appears to contradict a description of him given by a
fellow pupil, who remembered him as “self-absorbed and lacking in the kind of
communal geniality which endears a boy to his schoolfellows”. Certainly, at the
time, great status was attached to the team sports of rugger and cricket, and
there is no evidence to suggest that the young Horniman, “a largish, rather
red-faced chap”, was remotely interested in such activities. Rather, he chose
the challenge and stimulation of the School Debating Society.
Horniman’s approval of the motion that “capital punishment is
unworthy of a civilised country” saw him in a minority, a situation he was to
become accustomed to throughout his life in more ways than one. In the debate
he was up against unyielding Bible-quoters and boys who were, perhaps, a little
less cultured, thoughtful and sensitive.
Horniman left the school after sitting his final exams in July
1885. He is reported to have travelled to Bruges to complete his education
before taking to the stage at the age of 19, playing a number of Shakespearian
and other parts at various London theatres and in the provinces. He was
evidently successful, going on to appear alongside some of the greatest actors
of the age, notably Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree and Sir Johnston Forbes
Robertson.
But Horniman appears not to have been satisfied with an actor’s
life and his dramatic interests were finding another outlet in theatrical
management and authorship. He was attracted to the personality and work of the
playwright Oscar Wilde at a time when Wilde’s name was taboo outside of
theatrical circles, but the Wildean influence was to emerge regularly in
Horniman’s work. He took up the tenancy and management of the Criterion
Theatre, and, in 1899, his first play, Judy, was a success at the Prince of Wales’s
Theatre. This was followed by equally popular original comedy productions such
as Bellamy the Magnificent, and several successful adaptations of
English novels. His own novels and plays were the basis for several films in
the 1920s.
A contemporary described
Horniman as “a well-to-do bachelor who knew what did and what did not suit him,
marriage being in the latter category, the social round in the former”. The
euphemistic phrases “confirmed bachelor” and (in obituaries) “he never married”
were used from Victorian times as to indicate a gay man. It had only a few
years before Horniman was born that practising gay men faced execution and,
after 1861, imprisonment for ten years. And it was not until 1967, when a
progressive Labour Government legalised homosexual acts between men, that the
use of such euphemisms subsided.
But it was not only in theatrical circles that Horniman moved.
During the First World War, he did his bit by becoming chairman of a charity
which sent tobacco to soldiers and sailors on active service. Anger at the
flagrant wartime profiteering of the private railway companies prompted him to
research and write How to Make the Railways Pay for the War which
ran to three editions.
A vegetarian, Horniman was also a pioneering campaigner for what
we now describe as animal rights. He was treasurer, and then chairman, of the
Blue Cross Fund, a “society for the encouragement of kindness to animals”, and
was particularly concerned about the suffering of army horses at the front. He
also served on the committee for the Suppression of Cruelties to Performing
Animals and was an active campaigner for the British Union of
Anti-Vivisectionists. Following his death in 1930, the latter’s magazine, The
Abolitionist, described Horniman as “the most eloquent speaker on our
platforms… the grace of his diction, and his forceful personality, sent his
message straight home to any audience…although a very busy man, he never
refused to travel any distance to speak for us…”.
The sense that Horniman’s work had not been fully appreciated in
his lifetime was clear in the diary entry made by his nephew, serving in the
army in what is now West Pakistan. Having learned of his death in a newspaper,
he wrote, “Perhaps he’ll be recognised at his true value now he’s dead.”
Three years after Horniman’s death the film A Bedtime Story,
starring Maurice Chevalier, was adapted from one of his novels and met with
some success. But it was Horniman’s novel Israel Rank, published in
1907, that was to prove his lasting legacy, albeit bastardised, but in a good
way, by a talented and equally underrated film director called Robert Hamer.
Israel Rank was written by
Horniman when he was in his late thirties. It told the story of the murder of
six people who stood between the eponymous half-Jewish anti-hero and a dukedom.
The Wildean influence is clear in both the wit and the story, which critic Hugh
Kingsmill compared favourably to Dorian Gray. It was suggested that its theme
is essentially the same, that of “the apotheosis if the complete egotist”.
Early in the book the teenage Rank hides in a hedge at his school’s sports
ground with a trip-wire to fell his rival in love, an obnoxious anti-Semite who
is in training for a mile handicap. The rival is downed and is off school for
two weeks with concussion, much to Rank’s satisfaction.
His story, told in the first person, tells of a gradual
progression to serial-killing - the witty and charming and shocking confession
of a psychopath.
Few people have heard of this novel today, but many have seen
the loose screen adaptation which is recognised as one of Ealing Studios’
finest films.
In Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949), the director
Robert Hamer replaced Horniman’s Israel Rank with Louis Mazzini, of Italian
descent, who was played with suave campery by Dennis Price. Recasting the
murderer as originating from the birthplace of fascism clearly made sense after
the war, when the horror of the Holocaust was fresh in people’s minds.
Horniman’s depiction of a bitter and ambitious murderer as
Jewish has been criticised, as has his sympathetic portrayal of the character,
but a more informed interpretation, perhaps, is that the novel is a daring
parody of the very real anti-Semitism of Edwardian England.
The eight members of the D’Ascoyne family, representing aspects
of the British social order - the church, the legal system, the class system,
the City and middle-class values - are portrayed with remarkable
skill, authenticity and glee by Alec Guinness, who gamely dies eight
times, neatly and with great style.
Horniman’s book is far darker than the film. The psychopath
Israel Rank lives to enjoy his hard-earned dukedom in the final pages. But the
Ealing film, for all its wit and wonderful performances, cannot commit to this
in the final reel. It is implied that Mazzini gets his come-uppance at the end
of a rope (which was made explicit in the American version to meet the censors’
demands).
Perhaps it was just as well that Horniman, who debated against
capital punishment as a lad at Portsmouth Grammar School, who campaigned
against censorship as an adult, was not around to see it, though any
disappointment at what had been done to his novel might well have been offset
by an appreciation of what Simon Heffer has described as “the most perfect and
the most subversive of all British films”
Sources: The Portsmouthian, The Times, Illustrated London
News, Simon Heffer, book review of Israel Rank, Hugh Kingsmill, intro to Israel
Rank 1948 edition. With thanks to Verity Andrews of the University of Reading
for the extract from Horniman's nephew's diary and the obituary from The
Abolitionist.
See also James Burkinshaw's review of 'The Third Man' on its 75th anniversary
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.