Uncomfortably Off

  by Myles Nicholson



Uncomfortably Off is a thought-provoking exploration of the economic implications of wealth inequality, authored by economists Marcos Hernando and Gerry Mitchell. In this book, the authors delve into the consequences of income disparities, providing in-depth analysis of the various aspects of inequality. I found this work both engaging and illuminating, and it raises several vital questions and ideas that relate to my studies. However, there are also elements of their argumentation that I found lacking, and it's important to recognize that this is a topic where economists often hold divergent opinions. One thing that I found particularly in the book was that the book focused on neither the bottom or absolute top of the wealth spectrum where as it focused on the 10% of earners and showed that there is a big difference between the top 2% and the bottom part of the top 10% of earners. 

One of the aspects of  Uncomfortably Off that I particularly appreciate is the authors' ability to bring real-world examples and data into the discussion. Hernando and Mitchell skilfully use personal stories and case studies to illustrate the impact of wealth inequality on individuals and communities. This approach makes the complex topic of income inequality accessible and relatable to a wide range of readers, not just economists. It underscores the human dimension of economics, which is a point of convergence with my own studies. 

Moreover, Hernando and Mitchell's argument for the negative impact of wealth inequality on economic growth and stability resonates with many economic theories and empirical studies I've encountered during my studies. They make a compelling case for the idea that extreme differences in income can lead to social unrest, reduced economic mobility, and a less robust overall economy. This alignment with established economic thought reinforces the credibility of their arguments and their relevance to the field of economics.

However, Uncomfortably Off is not without its limitations. While the authors provide a persuasive case against wealth inequality, they might be criticised for not delving deeply into potential counterarguments. For instance, some economists argue that a certain degree of inequality can be a natural consequence of a market-based system and can incentivize individuals to work harder and innovate, ultimately benefiting society. Hernando and Mitchell could have addressed these counterarguments to present a more overall and equal view of the issue.

Furthermore, they primarily focus on the consequences of inequality but provide less insight into potential solutions. Economists often disagree about how to address wealth inequality, with varying different opinions on the effectiveness of policies like progressive taxation, wealth redistribution, and minimum wage increases. A more detailed exploration of these policy options and the potential trade-offs involved would have added depth to the book and made it more relevant to ongoing policy debates.


I believe it's essential to acknowledge that the field of economics is marked by significant disagreements on this topic. While Uncomfortably Off emphasises the negative consequences of wealth inequality, other economists argue that inequality can be a natural outcome of different skills and efforts and may not always be detrimental. Some economists believe that wealth inequality can be a key reason for economic growth.


In conclusion, Uncomfortably Off by Marcos Hernando and Gerry Mitchell is a thought-provoking book that provides perspective on the consequences of wealth inequality. However, it would have been more interesting if it had gone into potential counterarguments and offered a more detailed exploration of policy solutions to address wealth inequality. As with any work in economics, there are differing viewpoints on this topic, and it is important to consider multiple perspectives when forming a comprehensive understanding of the subject.  Nevertheless, Uncomfortably Off contributes to the ongoing discussion on wealth inequality and its implications for society and the economy. 


Comments