by Jo Morgan
‘We
must plot, we must plan. We must strategize, organize and mobilize’.
Killer Mike responding to the murder
of George Floyd
Image by Singlespeedfahrer (Wiki Commons) |
The
murder of black man George Floyd under the knee of a white police officer in
America has sparked protests across the world, led by Black Lives Matter. But
whilst thousands have taken to the streets in the UK to support the BLM
protests, other people have felt confused by this outpouring of anger and
solidarity.
Following
the first wave of UK protests, Kemi Badenoch MP dismissed the anger of the BLM
protestors by claiming that the ‘UK is one of the best places in the world to
be a black person.’ Others have criticised the protesters for taking to the
streets during lockdown. Some have objected to the tearing down of the Edward
Colston statue in Bristol. Petitions for schools to ‘de-colonize the curriculum’
have sadly been met with accusations of ‘virtue signalling’ and ‘political
correctness’.
So
is the anger of the BLM protestors in the UK justified or not?
Many
British people adopt the convenient delusion that racism is much more of an
American problem and that Britain is characterised by its tolerance (think
about all the sorts of things you ‘tolerate’ and you can see why BAME people
might want more than this). This distancing technique sometimes helps us to
ignore inequality in our own society and racism in our history. By focusing so
much on the transatlantic slave trade,
Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks and police brutality in the US, we deny the
reality of our past – the British empire in particular – and obscure the need for action in our own
British present.
Simeon Francis
(killed in police custody in Torquay this year)
|
As
well as being taught more about the history of racism in the US, our media
focuses more on the present-day racism there too. We have all heard of George
Floyd and Trayvon Martin, but have you heard of Chris Adler, Sean Rigg, Darren
Cumberbatch, Rashan Charles, Edson Da Costa, Simeon Francis? The list of
British BAME people who have died in custody is long. There are parts of the UK
where people with dark skin are 17 times more likely to be stopped and searched
than people with white skin. This daily lived experience matters. Ethnic minorities are significantly more
likely to receive prison sentences than white people, even when previous
convictions are taken into account. Police brutality against BAME people is
also a British problem. Although they are less than 3% of the population, black
people account for 8% of the deaths in custody. Despite this, there has only
been 1 prosecution of an individual for a black death in custody since 1969.
When
you watch the video of George Floyd being murdered, remember that black people
die in police custody here too.
When
people deny the need for BLM protests in the UK they fail to recognize the urgent
need for change here too. Some critics have focused their attention on the
minority of protestors (many of whom were white) who unlawfully removed the
statue of Edward Colston in Bristol. This statue commemorated a man who built a
fortune from stealing 84,000 Africans from their homes (including 12,000
children) and transporting them against their will to the Caribbean. Around
19,000 died en route (many thrown overboard while still alive, which was
standard treatment of sick slaves); the remainder were sold into slavery.
Arguments against the removal of the statue are many: the context of the time,
his philanthropic good deeds, the ‘preservation of history by statue’ and so
on. Why, these people have argued, could a peaceful debate not be had?
Toppling of the Colston statue (image: BBC) |
The
truth is – a balanced view is – that peaceful methods have been tried in
Bristol and failed for years. Petitions have included requests that the statue
be placed in a museum or that a plaque be added to explain the history.
However, these were rejected, and members of the council felt that the mention
of the 12,000 deaths of children was too distasteful, so that even a factual
plaque was not approved. So, it is not
quite as simple as a peaceful debate versus vandalism. Whilst councillors have debated the wording
for years (with many wanting to emphasise Colston’s philanthropy), British
people have had to accept this slave trader and mass murderer literally being
placed on a pedestal, while also knowing that their taxes continued to pay the
debt owed for compensating slave owners until 2015 (see details here)!There was a powerful symbolism, a poetic justice, to the fact that Edward
Colston’s statue, in being hurled into the water, was treated in the same way
he had treated thousands of sick and dying slaves during his brutal career.
Sometimes
change does not happen the way you would like.
If you are more offended by the act of tearing down the statue than the
racism it represents, or worry that it is the start of a slippery slope, then I
am afraid you may be part of the problem.
Some
white people have been keen to focus on and condemn this act of vandalism by
drawing on the pacifist achievements of Martin Luther King. But King himself argued that ‘a riot is the
language of the unheard’. It is true that a small minority of BLM protestors
allowed their anger to spill into disorder but the vast majority were peaceful
and dignified. Today, we do not condemn
the suffragettes for using ‘extreme’ methods to achieve justice when their
peaceful attempts went unheard. We do not dismiss the validity of their argument
because a minority of their actions involved civil disobedience. It seems
easier for some to dismiss the BLM protestors as a rabid mob than to listen to
their message demanding respect and equality.
Thousands
of furious far-right protestors have condemned the BLM protests and have taken
to the streets themselves to ‘defend’ already-protected statues; a number of
these individuals have been filmed shouting ‘We’re racist and we’re proud we
are’, Sieg Heiling, throwing bottles, and urinating beside the memorial to a
police constable. It is safe to say that
the members of Football Lads Alliance were, on balance, not as peaceful as the
BLM. These actions truly were
deplorable, and yet so many of those who condemned the BLM protests remained
strangely silent about the counter-protestors. So to emphasise Britain as a tolerant place free from overt
discrimination really does miss the point.
It
is a curious thing to see so many people, led by the Prime Minister, spend so
much time and energy passionately defending Winston Churchill’s statue when
almost nobody has called for it to be removed. Likewise, outrage over the
censorship of programmes like Little Britain provides a distraction, with the
implication being that Black Lives Matter has ‘gone too far’. But, if anything, their initial removal
seemed to be commercial caution from the broadcasters, not BLM demands.
The
BLM movement has implications for schools, of course. Calls for changes to
schools’ curricula to enhance understanding of issues relating to race,
including slavery and empire are designed to add to the curriculum, not take
away from it. Such calls have been dismissed as ‘politically correct’ ‘virtue
signalling’ attempts to rewrite history but what is being requested is the very
opposite. We need to teach our children more, not less. It is important that,
as British people, we resist biased exceptionalism by understanding and
acknowledging events of global significance such as Churchill’s disdain for
starving Bengali people during the Second World War or the brutal suppression
of the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya after the war. We need to understand Britain’s
role in facilitating slavery, not just abolishing it. We need to understand
that colonialism was often underpinned by violence and brutality. Now
is not the time to be defensive, now is the time to acknowledge those things,
and try in the spirit of trust and openness to see where we might sensibly
rebalance the curriculum.
When
you have never considered yourself as anything other than the norm, the default
position, a BLM demand to fight racism might feel like an attack - because you don’t ‘see race’ or ‘see colour’
or ‘see any racism’. But let’s reframe
this instead as an opportunity. It is not enough to dismiss the concerns of BLM
or to pay lip service to the movement whilst trying to undermine it. It is time to listen to BAME voices and stop
speaking over them or complaining about their tone. It is time to channel the
righteous anger sparked by George Floyd’s death, and the deaths of British
black people at the hands of the police, to really reflect on racism, and work
for some meaningful and lasting change.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.