by Anna Danso-Amoako
CRISPR technology (Wiki Commons) |
Humans have a long history with the manipulation of genes in
organisms, beginning in 12,000 BC with artificial selection of plants and
animals. This process involves influencing the breeding of organisms to ensure
desired phenotypes, visible attributes, are present in the offspring. An
example of this is breeding animals such as cows for their volume of milk. The
parents would be chosen for the large amount of milk they would be able to
produce. When bred together, they would produce offspring that carries the high
milk volume gene as the gene is inherited by the offspring. Through many
generations of selective breeding, the overall population should produce large
volumes of milk and create breeds such as Friesian cows.
Gene manipulation eventually became more advanced due to the
discovery of restriction enzymes in 1968. Secreted as a protein from bacteria,
they are essential towards the modification of genetic material as they have
the ability to “cleave” DNA foreign to themselves. Restriction enzymes from different
bacteria are able to identify short sequences of nucleotides bases present
within DNA and after identification of these sequences, the enzymes operate as
biological scissors by acting as a catalyst to the hydrolysis of phosphodiester
bonds between the nucleotides removing the sequence from the DNA.
While different bacteria produce restriction enzymes that
identify different sequences, restriction enzymes can be classified into four
different groups numbered one to four but it is the type II restriction enzyme
which is of greatest importance towards genetic modification, as they edit the
DNA in specific regions compared to the random nature in which the other
restriction enzymes alter DNA. After the enzymes were refined by scientist
Hamilton Smith, they were used by Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer to cut DNA
into segments that were later rejoined to be inserted into E.coli which
reproduced producing DNA that had been successfully altered, thus forming the
basis of genetic engineering.
However the our attempts to further refine the genetic
process have only become more refined with the advanced and controversial with
the invention of CRISPR technology. Standing for Clustered Regularly
Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, they were first observed by Japanese
scientists studying E.coli but their biological importance was unknown. That is
until a group of food scientists studying bacteria within the use of yogurt
production made a breakthrough: they served an important function with the
immune system within bacteria. When bacteria are under threat from viruses,
they produce enzymes which aid in the destruction of the virus in a similar
cleaving mechanism to restriction enzymes. However, fragments of the viruses’
genetic information are stored within the CRISPR regions of the bacteria. If
the bacteria is under attack by a virus it can send specific enzymes known as
Cas9, which hold the viral genetic information and search the virus for
material which matches it to be cleaved. This process has been altered to be
used in gene editing by providing the Cas9 with false RNA which resulted in the
enzyme successfully identifying and destroying it. In addition to this Cas9 can
also be used to silence certain genes to prevent them from functioning.
Why is this so revolutionary if we already have technology
similar to it that can carry out the same function as CRISPR? Quite simply, the
ease at which editing could be possible is unmatched by any other method of
manipulation. CRISPR can be done in hours and costing less than £100 the
accessibility to which this highly specialised genetic modification technology
is available is unprecedented. While searching, I found it was indeed possible
to buy your own CRISPR Kits. They are sold by a company known as The ODIN, run
by a controversial biohacker Josiah Zayner who demonstrated perfectly the
implications of such accessible technology could have by injecting himself with
CRISPR modified for muscle enhancement in the hopes of building his bicep.
While it didn’t actually work, the biological community has certainly reached a
grey area in regards to how the future applications of technology such as
CRISPR will look. It enables scientists to have the ability to change and edit
out parts of the DNA seen as undesirable. In some circumstances this is an a
gene that is widely accepted as a liability such as a fatal disease such as
Huntington’s however the lines become more blurred when we consider what should
actually be cured and if it is our place to determine this.
Modern science brings about change that is revolutionary but
poses questions we may never be fully able to answer but with the technology
already accessible it becomes increasingly pertinent that we must try. The
future will no doubt be filled with possibilities in which we will be able to
change life beyond recognition however we mist not lose sight of our ethical
standards to ensure that science doesn’t become a force to fear.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.