by Sam Griffiths
When we think of the worst people in history, we often think
of men such as Hitler, Stalin or Mao. It would only be reasonable considering
the millions of people that died due to their actions and the crimes against
humanity they committed. Rarely however, do we think of Leopold II, the constitutional
monarch of the small country of Belgium. On the surface, one would think that a
man in a position such as his would never be able to rival the most infamous
dictators of the 20th century, yet King Leopold is estimated to have
killed 10,000,000 people in the Congo, or around half of it’s population. How
was he able to possibly do this and why do we not think of him when thinking of
history’s greatest monsters?
Born in 1835, Leopold was never destined to wield great
power. He was just the prince of a lowly nation, an awkward young man with a
nose so large people could not help but remark on it, from his own mother to
the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli. The country of Belgium was barely
older than he was, it’s monarchs were bound by a constitution and held little
influence in the affairs of state. Yet Leopold held greater ambitions for
little Belgium, wishing to forge an empire for himself although few Belgians
shared this dream. He would end up searching the globe for a colony to call his
own, from Fiji to Brazil but in the end it would be Africa where he would set
his sights upon.
Henry Morton Stanley, the British explorer who had
discovered David Livingstone would be the man Leopold employed to explore the
area around the Congo river. Stanley pushed his way through the previously
unexplored lands of the deepest darkest Africa, charting out the Congo river
and the future borders of the Leopold’s colony. After finishing and returning
to Europe, Leopold would send Stanley on a second expedition, but this was not for
exploration. Stanley, when he wasn’t having his African servants whipped for
the slightest infraction, was to make local chiefs sign ‘treaties’, which in
reality signed away all sovereignty over the land to King Leopold, and their
labour too. The leaders of these tribes could barely read Stanley’s ‘treaties’ often
signing with just an X, essentially selling themselves into slavery for little
more than the clothes Stanley gave them in exchange. They would not know the
what had been done until it was too late.
Meanwhile in Europe, Leopold had been busy lobbying for
other nations to recognise his colony in the Congo. The king had been promising
that this was purely a philanthropic gesture, meant to evangelise the people of
Africa and fight against the evil of the Arab slave trade in Africa, little did
his supporters know that he would enslave the entirety of the Congo. Leopold
would set up and refer to shell companies with similar names in order to
smokescreen his darker intentions for the Congo. All his efforts would come to
ahead at the Berlin Conference, where Leopold would finally receive the colony
he dreamed of, a million square miles in the heart of Africa, rich in resources
and defenceless against the modern european weaponry.
The Congo would be entirely under the ownership of Leopold
too, his own personal fiefdom where the state of Belgium had absolutely no
control. Rubber would become the main resource harvested, with punishments set
out for those who did not meet their quota, including mutilation, flogging and
death. Leopold set up the Force Publique, a private army composed mostly
of African soldiers with white commanding officers to enforce his control over
the territory, and they used brutal force to do so. It was demanded that the
soldiers of the Force Publique would bring back a hand for every bullet
they used to prove they had not been wasted as starving soldiers often used
their bullets hunting for food. This in turn led to a whole economy based
around severed hands, as soldiers mutilated people across the Congo, severing the
hands of men women and children alike off. Likewise the rubber quota could be
met with gathering hands and wars were even fought between villages to gather
them. Leopold would disapprove of the dismemberment but not for any
humanitarian reason. He was quoted as saying "Cut off hands—that's
idiotic. I'd cut off all the rest of them, but not hands. That's the one thing
I need in the Congo”. In
essence, the king’s ‘Congo Free State’ had become one enormous labour
camp dedicated to the extraction of raw materials from rubber to ivory, easily
comparable to atrocities of the other great dictators of the 20th
century, as millions died in Leopold’s greed.
This system could not last forever though. In 1908, King
Leopold had relinquished control of his colony to the state of Belgium, in the
face of overwhelming public scrutiny. Despite the best efforts of the king, the
truth had eventually leaked out of the Congo, thanks to the good work of men
such as Roger Casement and George Washington Williams, who exposed the
appalling conditions in the colony. In the end, this would matter little as the
Leopold died just a year later anyway. While it would be easy to say his death
was the end of this dark tale, crimes against humanity committed by europeans
in Africa would not end with Leopold. Even after the Belgian government took
control of the Congo, they still treated the natives like animals, only banning
whipping as a punishment in 1955. Nor were the atrocities limited to the
Belgians, as the British placed Kenyans into concentration camps and had
thousands tortured during the Mau Mau uprising from 1952-60. It’s estimated
that anywhere between 11,000 and 100,000 Kenyans were killed by the British.
Perhaps it is easier for people in west today to remember how the atrocities of
Stalin and Hitler because they represented regimes alien to our own, whilst the
atrocities of Leopold provide us with a dark reflection of what happens in a
world where capitalism is allowed to go unchecked by laws or regulation, where
powerful people and companies can get away with heinous acts, as is still often
the case. So next time you are asked who you think history’s forgotten monster
is, spare a thought for King Leopold.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.