by Joe Brennan
Doctor Who has never been a show to shy away from a political agenda, one of Series 9’s more memorable moments was The Doctor’s anti-war speech. A powerful, beautifully performed high point of Capaldi’s era for some- for others, it was preachy unfounded propaganda that ignored the complexities of modern conflict. Most recently, the show made history with the inclusion of the diverse new companion- a bald android named Nardole! Oh and also Bill, the black lesbian was there too. While Bill was overall quite well received among fans, the biggest criticism of her character was the seemingly shoehorned references to her sexuality every episode. Those who had the sentiment that Bill’s character was limited to “gay”, the fear for the future series is that The Doctor’s change in gender will be dealt with similar level of subtlety (or lack of subtlety) as Bill’s sexuality. If every episode becomes an excuse for The Doctor to spout about her newly found feminist streak, the sceptical may have been proven to be right.
In 1966 after a strenuous number of encounters with
enemies both domestic and alien (topped off by the introduction of the iconic Cybermen), the old man who had been a face of safety and protection for three
years collapsed onto the floor of the TARDIS and disappeared in a bright flash
of light. Changing not only his face but the world of television itself. A
younger, scruffy looking man emerged. Someone who would be the new lead of the
show for years to come. With hardly any explanation, The Doctor we knew was
gone. The TARDIS was the same, the companions Ben and Polly were still there
and The Daleks hadn't changed - but the grumpy old man had seemingly been
replaced by a brand new man.
Since then, regeneration has been explained thoroughly
and accepted as a normal part of the show. A total of 13 men have portrayed The
Doctor and each one has managed to give his take on what makes him special.
Whether he be a charming romantic, a dandy scientist or a guilt-filled veteran,
every interpretation has been a successful and unique insight into the time
travelling alien. They have made the character iconic and have immortalised
themselves in the history of pop culture. As soon as (if not before) the
announcement in January that Peter Capaldi would be stepping down, fans
speculated the possible replacements. and finally on the 16th of July 2017,
after a Wimbledon victory for Roger Federer, the BBC announced the next actor to
take up a role that has been loved by the nation (and the world) since 1963. In
a decision almost as controversial as the initial recasting, Chris Chibnall
chose to cast…
A WOMAN
And not just any woman, mind you, a female one! The 13th
Doctor was to be played by Jodie Whittaker of Broadchurch fame. This news was
met with… a mixed response:
While there is a positive majority, there is a strikingly
high number of dislikes- with thousands deciding Doctor Who will essentially be
over after Christmas this year. “What's next? A female James Bond?” seems to
being thrown around. The two sides are complicated and there's a toxic attitude
on both sides. A certain group of people whose message of “tolerance” included
enough unfounded harassment towards ex-Doctor Peter Davison that he left Twitter. The nature of the issue is one that someone can't voice their concerns
or their positive opinions without the opposing side retaliating. Davison
claimed that, while he felt Jodie Whittaker would do an excellent job, he felt
it a shame that one of the few remaining non-violent, intelligent male role
models was gone. Agree with his sentiment or not, it's hard to see this comment
as the incoherent ramblings of a “sexist windbag” that some outlets are
claiming it is.
A growing concern (after the initial shock of the reveal)
is why they chose to do this. Why now? A common feeling is that this was done
not for a creative or artistic reason, but a purely political statement in a
time where the issue of gender identity is becoming more and more prominent. Did
Chibnall pick Whittaker for the role because she was the best choice? Or was it
a statement? Is he taking the program in a new direction to better entertain
his fans or is he merely pandering to the rising presence of the social justice
warrior?
The unfortunate answer is: we don't know. Only time will tell. Hopefully the next series will make it clear which path the BBC are going to take it. While the change in gender is obviously not something that can be ignored, it should never become the primary focus of the series.
The unfortunate answer is: we don't know. Only time will tell. Hopefully the next series will make it clear which path the BBC are going to take it. While the change in gender is obviously not something that can be ignored, it should never become the primary focus of the series.
Doctor Who has never been a show to shy away from a political agenda, one of Series 9’s more memorable moments was The Doctor’s anti-war speech. A powerful, beautifully performed high point of Capaldi’s era for some- for others, it was preachy unfounded propaganda that ignored the complexities of modern conflict. Most recently, the show made history with the inclusion of the diverse new companion- a bald android named Nardole! Oh and also Bill, the black lesbian was there too. While Bill was overall quite well received among fans, the biggest criticism of her character was the seemingly shoehorned references to her sexuality every episode. Those who had the sentiment that Bill’s character was limited to “gay”, the fear for the future series is that The Doctor’s change in gender will be dealt with similar level of subtlety (or lack of subtlety) as Bill’s sexuality. If every episode becomes an excuse for The Doctor to spout about her newly found feminist streak, the sceptical may have been proven to be right.
In my opinion, the female Doctor is not something to be
feared but something that we should be excited for. Trust must be placed in the
creative team as we hope they embrace the changes but don't let it ruin what's
special about the show. We as audience members and fans need to understand that
adaptation is an important part of Doctor Who and, had change been avoided in
the past, the show would have ended in 1966 at the departure of William
Hartnell. Jodie Whittaker is a fantastic actress (for those who are still sceptical
about that, check out in the National Theatre production of Antigone- clips are
on YouTube) and the show is in the competent hands of Chris Chibnall. Should
the next series fail, re-evaluation could be necessary but at the moment, the
future of Doctor Who is looking extremely interesting. But regardless of
whether you support the female Doctor or not, try to make an effort to
understand the other side of the argument instead of labelling them “the
enemy”. If someone is against the idea, try asking them why they feel this way
instead of immediately calling them a sexist bigot who can't stand seeing a
woman in a position of power. The same advice goes for talking to someone who
is extremely supportive of it; try to understand their enthusiasm before you brand
them a feminazi social justice warrior Dalek.
If you've read this far, I'd be interested to know your
thoughts. Drop me a comment under the article or if you know me, tell me how
you feel about this controversial casting choice.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.