by Thomas Locke
Today, Britain goes to the polls, to decide who voters feel is
fit to lead the country and guide us through the upcoming Brexit negotiations.
After weeks of campaigning, debating, questioning, name calling and touring the
country in brightly coloured “battle buses”, the day has arrived to cast your
vote.
While the news is choked with stories of polls claiming to know who
people are backing, only you know who is getting your support. Whether it's
Theresa May you're keen on with her “Strong and Stable” approach or whether you
have a hankering for Jeremy Corbyn or Tim Farron of the Lib Dem parish, whoever
you vote for today, we will soon ascertain what implications it will have on
Britain and its future.
However, instead of glaring into the murky waters of
Britain’s fate, on this poignant day, I would like to take this time to look
back at the last few weeks and relive some of the most memorable moments of the
2017 Snap General Election.
1. Theresa May calls a snap general election
Standing in front of Number 10, the Prime Minister said
that:
“Since I became prime minister I have said that there should
be no election until 2020, but now I have concluded that the only way to
guarantee certainty and stability for the years ahead is to hold this election”
2. The Party Manifestos.
As Portsmouth Point
is politically neutral, the manifestos have been placed in order of popularity
(based on YouGov polls on the 7th May 2017):
Conservatives: key policies include replacing the triple-lock on state
pensions to a “double-lock”, means testing winter fuel allowances, scrapping
free school lunches for infants and cutting net migration to below 100,000. There are no figures mentioned in the Conservative manifesto
and their policies have not been costed.
Labour: key policies include the scrapping university tuition fees,
nationalising England’s water companies, ending zero hours contracts, hiring
10,000 new police officers and introducing a 45p and 50p tax rate for those
earning £80,000 and £123,000 respectively. Labour has costed all of their policies, although it has
been criticised by some, with the Conservatives referring to their financial
planning as relying on a “magic money tree”.
Liberal Democrats: key policies include a second EU referendum, a 1% rise in
income tax to pay for NHS and social care, a ban on the sale of diesel cars and
small vans by 2025, the legalisation of cannabis and the extension of
free childcare to all two-year olds.
UKIP: key policies include reducing net migration to zero within
five years, banning the wearing of face coverings in public areas (burqa ban),
cutting VAT on household bills, implementing 20,000 more police officers and
spending meeting the NATO benchmark of spending 2% of GDP on defence.
Green: key policies include implementing a four-day working week,
protecting freedom of movement, a referendum on the final Brexit deal, lowering
the voting age to 16, cancelling Trident replacement and introducing
proportional representation.
3. The One Show
Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn appeared on the BBC
evening talk show The One Show.
Theresa May appeared on the show first and viewers of the
programme were quick to criticise comments made by May and her husband,
Philip, after they discussed the dividing up of household chores. Critics said that their perceptions of “boy and girl jobs” were “outdated” and one person called
it “sexism at its finest”. Kezia Dugdale, the leader of the Scottish Labour party, tweeted: “Seconds into The One Show, the Prime Minister tells the country
there are ‘boy jobs and girl jobs’ at home – I despair.”
When Jeremy Corbyn appeared on the show, he discussed his
love for manhole covers and allotments as well as offering presenters, Alex
Jones and Ore Oduba, a jar of his home-grown jam.
The Labour Leader took a bash at Theresa May on the show by
stating that there were not ‘girl’ and ‘boy’ jobs in the Corbyn household. Viewers
appeared to appreciate his appearance on the programme and he was praised as
‘human’ for his honest comments, described as a ‘warm, funny and a genuinely human’ person.
4. Diane Abbott and
the recurrence of “car crash” interviews
Labour’s shadow Home Secretary, Diane Abbott, was speaking
to Nick Ferrari to announce the party’s new plans for policing and crime when
at one point, she claimed that the policy of implementing 10,000 additional
police officers would cost £300,000 - the equivalent of an annual salary
of £30.00 per police officer. Ms Abbott then tried to clarify the cost of
the policy, stating that it would cost “about £80m”. Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn confirmed later that day that
the policy would cost £300m, saying that he was “not embarrassed” by the
interview on LBC that was dubbed a “car crash” by users online.
Ms Abbott suffered another embarrassing television
interview, this time on Sky News, whilst discussing the report by Lord Harris on
improving London’s ability to respond to a terrorist attack. She told Dermot Murnaghan of Sky News that she would
“revisit the report” but, when asked about which section she would revisit, the
Labour MP told him: "Well I think it's just about preparedness and
resilience."
On the 7th of June, the Labour party confirmed that Diane
Abbott would be taking a break from campaigning as she “was not well” and
shadow minister Lyn Brown is to stand in for Ms Abbott who couldn’t attend two
media appearances on Tuesday 6th June.
5. Political
Advertising
The 2017 General Election has seen a rise in parties using
social media companies to target a demographic of people with specially
designed advertisements that have been developed with the psychology of an
individual taken into consideration. This has led to an array of highly
personal and targeted ads popping up on people’s Facebook feeds in an attempt
to influence their political views.
Whilst this new breed of advertising has proved to be
effective and powerful, in my opinion the most provoking and striking
advertisement by a political party was one commissioned by the Liberal
Democrats (see above)). The controversial poster was launched by Vince Cable who
said that the Conservatives had “adopted” UKIP’s stance on Brexit and Farage’s
warm view of US president Donald Trump. He mentioned the Conservative manifesto, which had a focus on reducing net migration to the tens of thousands, and the
Lib Dems’ economics spokesperson said that this is evidence of the
Conservatives following Farage in wanting to “keep foreigners out”.
6. Theresa May or May
Not turn up
There was a notable absence of the Conservative leader from
televised debates and media interviews throughout the course of the election campaign.
Mrs May declined invitations to debate the other leaders of the UK’s major
political parties and an invitation to appear on BBC Woman’s Hour on BBC Radio
4 with Emma Barnett. On numerous occasions, Amber Rudd, the Conservative’s Home
Secretary has had to replace the Prime Minister.
Some have criticised Mrs May for her lack of attendance to
public events saying that it contradicts her slogan of “Strong and Stable”,
showing a “Weak and Wobbly” persona.
7. Terrorism and
Security interrupt election campaigning.
The two recent terror attacks that occurred during the seven
weeks of election campaigning made the threat of terrorism apparent. As with other issues, each party plans to tackle the threat differently, with Theresa May
suggesting alterations and accommodations to be made to the Human Rights Act to
help the security services combat terrorism.
It has been made clear that this vote on June 8th is not
just on Brexit, not just on taxes, the NHS or social care; it is also based on
terrorism and security and how the police force can protect the country.
Whether it be more PCSOs patrolling our streets or an additional 10,000 police
officers deployed, there are likely to be changes to the current solutions available.
Election campaigning was suspended twice after the attacks
to show respect to the victims and to discuss the issues in parliament.
Katie Hopkins offered her solution to some 700,000 followers
on Twitter, saying that we need a ‘final solution’ to terrorism- a term used by
the Nazi’s to reference the Holocaust and ethnic cleansing. That tweet lead to
her dismissal from radio station LBC, which I have previously discussed here.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.