by Oliver Clark
The House of Lords, by a majority of 102, voted
to amend the Article 50 bill, attempting to ensure that EU Citizens living in
the UK will have a guaranteed right to stay, before we begin our negotiations
with the EU. As I sit here grimacing at a sub par Question Time, I feel like I
have to weigh in on this nonsensical issue, in as few words as possible so that
I can return to my ever growing pile of IB work.
Brexiteers have often been seen as out of touch,
racist, xenophobic little Englanders, but one thing that was never questioned
was the right of EU citizens to remain here after the referendum. Was
immigration an issue? Yes. Did Brexiteers want the countries immigration policy
to the UK be decided by the UK government? Yes. Did the result signal a vote
against the open door policy that we have adopted since 2004? Yes. But were
deportations ever mentioned? Of course not. I do not think for one second that
the UK will deport EU nationals after the negotiations are finished. However,
do I agree with the Lords decision to amend the Article 50 bill. The answer to
this is a resounding no, for two key reasons.
The bill in question is simply deciding as to
whether the government should begin negotiations with the EU on the 1st of
April this year. The idea that the act has anything to do with the terms of the
negotiation is ludicrous. Negotiations, by their nature, are between 2 or more
parties. In the case of the ever more divided European Union, we are
effectively entering talks with 27 individual countries in a collective manner.
The idea that we should begin strong-arming the government into a particular
direction before the talks begin is ludicrous at best, and at worst will
potentially harm our eventual negotiating strategy.
But secondly, and most importantly to me, simply
because of how it is overlooked by so many on the other side of the debate, is
the status of the 1.2 million UK nationals living in the EU. It was well
publicised that in talks with Angela Merkel, Theresa May attempted to remove
the status of EU and UK citizens from the negotiations. However, Mrs Merkel
refused. The sheer hypocrisy of the Lords, and those backing their decision
astounds me. Why on earth should we ‘guarantee’ the rights of EU citizens in
the UK, when the EU has stated that it will make no reciprocal deal before the
negotiations begin?
The UK government has a duty to protect the
people of the UK. To me, that includes both UK citizens abroad, and people
living in the country, contributing to the economy and adding to the culture of
the country. But the idea that we should blindly guarantee the rights of EU
citizens living here with no such deal in place for UK citizens abroad is
simply illogical. If this idealistic ‘act of good will’ approach may work in
the minds of the liberal left, but in the cold, harsh world of reality, one
must take nothing for granted. The next two years are going to be bruising for
the UK, and I genuinely believe that we will be better off for it outside of
the EU, but this approach by the House of Lords simply does not make sense to
me.
The members of The Lords are backing the view of many others, that human beings should not be used as pawns in negotiations. Regardless of the EU's stance on UK nationals living in Europe, Britain should guarantee the rights of EU citizens living here. Full stop. End of story. Public pressure would then ensure that the EU did the same, but even if they didn't, it is a seperate issue - this isn't a game of tit-for-tat.
ReplyDeleteArthur Doyle
Ps The House of Lords should be abolished, but that's another issue!