by Will Dry
As a boy, Alan Mak grew up above a Chinese takeaway. His
eyes light up when he speaks of watching his parents scrub and cook dishes all
night to provide a better life for their children. He inherited this tendency
towards working hard. He did so in tests, and got a scholarship to a good ‘PGS
type school’, and certainly made the most of it – having studied law at both
Oxford and Cambridge. After a successful careers in both the private and social
sector, he is now – at the tender age of 31 - the MP for Havant.
Educated at Oxbridge, a career in corporate law, parachuted
into a safe seat with no local connections: it would be easy to caricature him
as ‘yet another career politician.’ To a certain extent this caricature is
accurate; he is rumoured to deliberately sit behind the Prime Minister at PMQs,
and apparently sent his Maiden Speech to Downing Street. Beyond such activities
(which he dismissed as ‘tittle tattle’), there is the accusation he deceived
his constituency selection panel on Europe - claiming he was Eurosceptic to the
local association, before supporting the In camp. There are also the odd
rumours that he exaggerated both endorsements from national newspapers and his
church attendance, and fiddled his expenses while Ents Officer of the Cambridge
Union. One could therefore have forgiven the PGS students for thinking we were meeting a
Frank Underwood-Machiavelli character who was just not very successful at
covering his tracks.
Fortunately, however, this was not the case.
Mak is undoubtedly a charming man, and was at ease when answering
our questions. Sometimes, too relaxed. On the EU, Google’s sweetheart tax deal,
and the Tory leadership election, he parroted the responses of Cameron and co.
Sometimes the conversation lapsed into verbal tetris, where he would awkwardly
fit memorised lines alongside any given blocks of context. It was at these
points in the interview that we all had our doubts, beginning to believe Havant
had just elected a talking computer. However, for what Mak underperforms in
ideological originality, he makes up for in action. Released from the newsspeak
of the Tory manifesto, he rattled off his repertoire of local initiatives –
from his jobs fair, to the Havant Headstart scheme and the newly introduced Community
Action Awards. He has even been willing to exert his soft power as an MP, working
with Stagecoach to create discounts for local students. He has thrown himself
into the Havant community – from making his debut for Havant hockey, to
visiting almost every school in the constituency.
Mak explained he believed in action, not just empty debate.
Upon understanding this, there is a subtler explanation to his Tory party
loyalty: it is not done out of laziness, but because he believes to make things
happen one needs to be part of a cohesive team. When asked if he had ever
rebelled he replied ‘no’, not unusual for a new MP, but when asked if he could
see himself rebelling, he also said ‘no.’ Very unusual for any MP, especially a
backbencher. The reason? Cut him and he might just bleed blue – it would match
his cufflinks and tie. There is no doubt he is a party man, and little
ambiguity over his ambitions for a ministerial role in the future. The real
question mark lies over who he will be supported in the upcoming Tory
leadership election; while his loyalty to the current party establishment might
say Osborne, the temptation of a faster rise up the greasy pole might lure him
into Camp Boris. Depending on how Mak plays his hand, and future internal Tory
party politics, Britain might join Havant in learning more about this new MP.
The real question is this: can William Dry write a Portsmouth Point article without a Frank Underwood reference?
ReplyDeleteThe real question does Tom Dry spend too much time scrutinising my articles, and not enough time spent towards trying to scrape a first. (Much like Underwood, who entered a State Senate race while still studying at the Sentinel!)
ReplyDelete