by Floss Willcocks
Feeling guilty from a recent lack of literary diversity, I decided to go and see the new film adaptation of Macbeth released to the cinemas last Friday. Prior to the film I ran through my sparse knowledge of the murderous play in preparation, and I remembered just how complex each character's diverse range of emotions must be for the actors as the tragedy unfolds. I hoped very much that the famous faces of Michael Fassbender (Macbeth), Marion Cotillard (Lady Macbeth) and David Thewllis (King Duncan) would fill the huge boots of those who have slayed the roles on stage. (Patrick Stewart and Kate Fleetwood's performance in Chichester and London almost 8 years ago is certainly a hard act to follow).
Feeling guilty from a recent lack of literary diversity, I decided to go and see the new film adaptation of Macbeth released to the cinemas last Friday. Prior to the film I ran through my sparse knowledge of the murderous play in preparation, and I remembered just how complex each character's diverse range of emotions must be for the actors as the tragedy unfolds. I hoped very much that the famous faces of Michael Fassbender (Macbeth), Marion Cotillard (Lady Macbeth) and David Thewllis (King Duncan) would fill the huge boots of those who have slayed the roles on stage. (Patrick Stewart and Kate Fleetwood's performance in Chichester and London almost 8 years ago is certainly a hard act to follow).
It is safe to say that I was not in the slightest bit disappointed.
The evil and bitter concepts of the tragic tale was strengthened by the
tempestuous scenery of the Scottish Highlands and lead ardently by a
mud-smeared, blood-soaked Fassbender. The first battle scene throws the viewers
into the middle of angry warfare, but the incredible slow motion footage and
murky lighting left me in awe of the beautiful photography instead of the
savage bloodshed.
...not that I'm saying the film isn't sufficiently full of gore! The brutal end to David Thewllis (Duncan) is enough to make any
horror-fan squint in anguish, and this, following a thoughtful portrayal of the
"Is this a dagger..." soliloquy allows the build up of emotion to
result in a truly horrific outburst of violence. I wouldn't say that I'm a huge
fan of the massacre genre, but I think that this Shakespeare play is so
notoriously full of blood-thirst and evil that if there was any less
unnecessary slaughter, the vital tragic concept of Macbeth's insanity and
ambition would be lost.
Although the actors showed very strong talent (especially
the young Fleance - a child-actor without lines but extremely heart-rending
expression), I praise particularly the work of the almost unknown director
Justin Kurzel. While keeping to many traditional Macbeth themes - the Scottish
Highland scenery and medieval time setting - he adds many of his own
interpretations of the script, as Shakespeare never included stage directions.
My favourite was his portrayal of the witches' prophecy of "Birnam woods
coming to Dunsinane". Diverting from the usual scene of Macduff leading
Malcolm's army to the castle hidden behind branches, the famous Birnam Wood is
burnt to the ground by the English soldiers, and it is the ash of the trees
blown by the wind that fulfils the prophecy and sends Macbeth into panic. This
lays the scene for a perfect last battle ignited in bright flames and ash,
contrasting dramatically with previously dark scenes.
I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed this film, enough to
inspire me to turn my thoughts into a review, but from the view of a casual fan
of Shakespeare rather than a deeply analytical thinker. True - in a way it made
me miss the English Literature lessons which I dropped at the end of year 11
for more logic-based subjects, but at the same time I was glad to sit back and
simply appreciate the abridged language and prose of the film, without thinking
about how I would write an essay about it!
Strongly recommended!
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.