by Isabelle Welch
Palo Alto, Gia
Coppola’s adaption of James Franco’s short story collection, is about
teenagers’ half-hearted attempts to toy with trouble - to rebel. Coppola focuses
less on a doomed generation, but rather a generation that has been exposed to
‘grown up’ things without really growing up at all. It’s about the void in
teenage heads and lives, and how they try to fill it
Like much of Franco’s art, the film mimics his own fitful school
years, flirting with boundaries, teetering on the edge. The film focuses on
four teenagers in particular, their actions poised somewhere between attention
seeking and boredom: a potent mix of public intoxication, weed, car jacking and
drunk driving.
I found the portrayal of ‘adults’ to be particularly powerful in
both Coppola’s screenplay and Franco’s original short story collection. The
film begins to capture the stinging realization that adults are not perfect;
the realization which comes to all teenage narcissists sooner or later, that
the adults with whom one comes into contact as a teenager are not all operating
with one’s best interests at heart. All of the adults in the film are tried and
found guilty of ulterior motives and wayward agendas: an art teacher babbling
of his near-death experience, April’s (Emma Roberts) weed-smoking Dad (Val
Kilmer) and a Mum whose concern for her daughter switches on and off as
casually as a light.
In true, wickedly ironic Franco style, James plays the villain
of his own creation - the sketchy school, football coach who involves himself
with his vulnerable players. April’s eventual surrender to him captures the
role sex plays in teenagers' lives, somewhere between self-exploration and
power-play. Consumed by a bad day, April asserts herself the only way she can
think of: sex. Cappola communicates this subtly, yet powerfully as she
juxtaposes the maturity of the passionate act against the apparent child-like
vulnerability of April, freezing the shot on her ‘days of the week’ knickers.
Trust issues ripple throughout the film, conjuring up questions
perhaps a bit too existential for a weekend afternoon: can you trust anybody?
Can you even trust yourself? Coppola, likely seeking inspiration from her Uncle
Francis, turns to nature to convey April’s lack of trust in her school counselor-
the shriveled plant on her desk, symbolic of her ability to help her students
‘grow.’
Perhaps Palo Alto struck a chord for me, as it begins to dissect
the hurdles one faces in the transition from child to adult, a struggle I feel particularly
familiar with as a Lower Sixth deciding which Uni to apply to.
I personally found the film had little substance: the plot didn't seem to be able to establish itself until the last fifteen minutes and even then it didn't allow space for any of the characters to develop; the one character likely to develop (Teddy) was ignored for a lot of the film making it difficult to appreciate his story arc; Fred felt like a supporting role but was given as much screen time as the others leading to a lot of pointless scenes that had little effect and far less punch than the rest of the film; and finally April, seemingly the main character, was not interesting nor likable enough to watch for 90 minutes. Clearly you saw more into this film than I but I personally was a little disappointed and found myself itching for it to reach a conclusion that in the end didn't seem worth the wait. However I am glad you managed to enjoy it.
ReplyDelete