by Sophie Locke-Cooper
Realist art |
Connecting to education, it is supposedly directly related to
the purpose of life, lives of individuals and society education. Education
cannot be fully understood without understanding the ultimate goal being sourced
to the goal of human life. The first
perception says that the philosophy of education can be composed because of the
linear relationship between philosophy and education.
The term realism comes from the Latin 'realist' which is to
be really, really real. The philosophy of realism assumes that there is a real
external word of which can be recognised. That sensory perception and sensory
of an objects existence is what realism holds.
Regardless of the sense of mind that it was God, because the object can
be examined, investigated, analysed and studied by science. Realism
acknowledges and excepts the unity between esensia and existence, the nature
and existence of objects which can be captured by the mind and our five senses.
There are many different parts to realism:
Humanistic realism; is the reaction against the emphasis on
form and style of the old classical literature. It has great regard for the
ancient literature but it emphasises the study of content and ideas in the
ancient classical literature to understand one's present life and environment.
The aim is not to study the form and style of old literature to have mastery
over it. The study of old literature is a means to understand the practical
life.
Social realism: Social realism in education is the reaction
against a type of education that producers scholars and professional men to the
neglect of the man of affairs i.e. practice. Education should not produce
people who are unfit in social life. The purpose of education, according to
social realists, is to prepare the practical man of the world.
Sense realism: The sense realism in education emphasises the
training of senses. Senses are the gateway to knowledge and learning takes
place the operation of the senses. According to sense-realists nature is the
treasure house of all-knowledge and this knowledge can be obtained through the
training of the senses.
Neo-realism: Is really a philosophical though. It appears in
the methods and results of modern development in physics. They do not consider
the scientific principles everlasting whilst they express the changeability in
them. They support the education of art with the science and analytical system
of education with the humanistic feelings.
The realist claims to be objective. Objectivity in knowledge
is nothing but the partnership of personal knowledge. Knowledge is always
subjective. The realist recognises the origin of knowledge from the datum
achieved by senses and asserts that only objects are main and it is through
their contact that knowledge is acquired. Then how does our illusion arise? How
does knowledge become fallacious? Where does the external object go in our
dream? The realist is unable to answer these questions satisfactorily.
The realist does not accept the existence of transcendental
(not based on experience or reason) being. How could we know the non-existence?
Has non-existence got no existence? Voidness and non-existence also are the
parts of existence. Here the realist shows a major flaw.
Today the effect of realism has given rise to the wave of
science. It is right, but there should be no indifference towards art and
literature. The realist supports this negligence.
Realism exacerbates disappointment in students and teachers. No progress can be made by having faith in the facts of daily life and shattering faith in ideals. Life is full of misery and suffering. Sorrow is more predominant than joy in the world. A person becomes disappointed by this feeling. Hence the reason realists appear to be sceptics, pessimists and objectionists.
The doctrine of realism believes that with something or the
other way there are things that are just in and of themselves and that not essentially affected by someone or something else.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.