by Loren Dean
Drugs have been used by a wide span of the population for
various reasons since their discovery; therefore, the act of illegality in the UK is a relatively new concept. It came about because of a significant increase in
usage in under 16's in the 1960s - the Misuse Of Drugs Act was brought in in
1971 to tackle the problem of underage usage. Since then there have been strong
debates discussing the legalisation of drugs in the UK.
Drugs are dangerous. That is a fact and therefore there
should be severe consequences and penalties for users who seem to ignore the
risk. By making something legal this gives the false impression of safety
around the substance, which is obviously untrue. According to the Drug Project
and Journal of American Medical Association, 900,000 Americans die each year from
substance abuse, alcohol and tobacco. The vast majority of these deaths are
caused by the already-legal substances and it is thought that illegal drug
abuse might be lower due to the criminal status of the substance; this
therefore proves that the current drug laws are effective and should remain in
place.
A common misconception of the term legalisation is that it means unregulated. If now-illegal drugs were made legal then they would have to be
strictly regulated with age restrictions and the like, just like tobacco and
alcohol now. The legalisation of illegal drugs would benefit society because, as
of right now, drugs are a criminal paradise where there is not any regulation; as a result, there are a lot of backstreet concoctions of drugs which can be cut with
anything from talcum powder to rat poison. Therefore, the main causes of deaths
is that users do not ever 100% know what is going into their bodies; the
difference between batches can be fatal.
It should not be forgotten that substances such as
alcohol and tobacco are drugs that have become socially acceptable, so this may
be the concern that we need to change the mindset of the nation. The negative
effects that legal drugs have on our society are far more evident than illegal
drugs on the street. For example, alcohol disrupts judgement, causing deaths of
innocent third-party victims as a result of accidents like drink-driving
collisions. 90,000 British citizens per year die from smoking and tobacco causes
a large variety of cancers for example lung or oral cancer. This is a major concern as
these numbers may skyrocket if all illegal drugs become legal. It is known that
cannabis - currently a Class B drug - is forty times more deadly than a single
cigarette when smoked; if this was legalised too, the consequences could be
catastrophic.
Because drugs are illegal, there is a fluctuating black
market system by which the cost of drugs increases and so users are more likely
to commit crimes to obtain money for expensive drugs. There was a case where a
young man stole diamonds worth $160
thousand to pay for a few wraps of marijuana which proves the extent someone
will go to pay for a $20 drug wrap. If drugs were legalised, it would mean cheaper prices with
no need for a black market so no need for drug-related crime to settle the
debts of expensive drugs.
It is thought that a positive argument for the legalisation of
drugs is that they can be taxed; however, this is very short-sighted and can lead
to the development of a black market for tax evaders and those who cannot
afford taxes but are already heavily reliant on drugs who thus may commit crimes - this starts the whole vicious cycle related to drugs all over again as a direct
result of legalisation.
On the other hand, it is also known that the most
effective means of drug-use reduction is educating the younger generations of the
dangers in schools; coupled with the deterrents of jail sentences and a
criminal record this may be the way forward for the future. The problem is that
we need to deter the next generation of drug users away from drugs; then there
would be no need for legalisation or illegality but 90% of minors are
introduced to drugs and are exposed to the criminal lifestyle by their parents
or immediate carers. This needs to be stopped.
However, proof that legalising drugs can work is
Portugal.
In 2001, it became the first European country to officially abolish all criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine. At the recommendation of a national commission charged with addressing Portugal's drug problem, jail time was replaced with the offer of therapy. The argument was that the fear of prison drives addicts underground and that incarceration is more expensive than treatment — so why not give drug addicts health services instead? Under Portugal's new regime, people found guilty of possessing small amounts of drugs are sent to a panel consisting of a psychologist, social worker and legal adviser for appropriate treatment (which may be refused without criminal punishment) instead of jail. At the time, critics in the poor, socially conservative and largely Catholic nation said decriminalizing drug possession would open the country to "drug tourists" and exacerbate Portugal's drug problem; the country had some of the highest levels of hard-drug use in Europe. But the recently released results of a report commissioned by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, suggest otherwise.
In 2001, it became the first European country to officially abolish all criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine. At the recommendation of a national commission charged with addressing Portugal's drug problem, jail time was replaced with the offer of therapy. The argument was that the fear of prison drives addicts underground and that incarceration is more expensive than treatment — so why not give drug addicts health services instead? Under Portugal's new regime, people found guilty of possessing small amounts of drugs are sent to a panel consisting of a psychologist, social worker and legal adviser for appropriate treatment (which may be refused without criminal punishment) instead of jail. At the time, critics in the poor, socially conservative and largely Catholic nation said decriminalizing drug possession would open the country to "drug tourists" and exacerbate Portugal's drug problem; the country had some of the highest levels of hard-drug use in Europe. But the recently released results of a report commissioned by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, suggest otherwise.
The paper, published by Cato in April, found that in the
five years after personal possession was decriminalized, illegal drug use among
teens in Portugal declined and rates of new HIV infections caused by sharing of
dirty needles dropped, while the number of people seeking treatment for drug
addiction more than doubled. Similar parallels could be drawn if this policy
was to come into affect in the UK.
To sum up, I believe that legalising drug
all drugs would be counter productive as the resulting impact of very
dangerous hard drugs like heroin could be catastrophic; however, new, updated drug laws would be the right step forward to remove the stigma
against addicts who seek help. I think that following the footsteps of Portugal
and decriminalising drugs to offer healthcare is the best possible option.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.