by Olly Clark
After last weekend’s matches, we were left with some statistics
that greatly contradict the 'Best in the World' label. First of all, I shall
start with the once unstoppable Manchester United. This is a team that has won
12 of the last 20 league titles, all of which were under the reign of the
living legend Sir Alex Ferguson. Now in the near 18 months it has been since
Sir Alex stepped down as manager of the club, United have been a shadow of
their former self. That may in fact be being generous to them, this is a team
that in those 18 months recorded 12 league losses in a season (thus failing to
achieve qualification for the Champions League), have spent over £210 million
on transfers and yet, despite Louis Van Gaal replacing David Moyes, the worst
start to a season since Ferguson's debut back in 1987, including a 4-0
humiliation by none other than MK Dons. You would think that a team performing
as poorly as this would be punished by other teams, hungry to make a name for
themselves by killing off the once-undisputed best team in England.
In the first 11 weeks of this season, the label that is
all too often associated with the Premier League has been undermined in almost
every aspect of its meaning.
Louis Van Gaal (Wiki Commons) |
But no.
Last week, United sat at 7th, only 2 points off of a
Champions League spot. Last weekend saw them beat Crystal Palace 1-0 (their
fourth victory with the same score this campaign) in a match that, despite
being a quite frankly dominant display, exposed United's inability to turn
their excessive 71% possession and 23 shots into goals. In other leagues, teams
would be ripping United apart due to their lack of quality in the final third,
but the majority of the teams in the Premier League are at this moment not any
more clinical than United.
"Okay Olly,
you say that other teams in other leagues would have superior quality than
those in the Premier League, where is your proof?" I hear you cry.
Look no further than Europe's top club competition, the Champions League.
With the exception of Chelsea, the English representation
in this year’s competition has been quite frankly embarrassing, with Arsenal
scraping points off teams that they should be beating with ease, and with
Liverpool and Manchester City almost certain group stage casualties after only
4 matches. Last year’s English champions, City, have been outplayed in all 4 of
their matches thus far in their group, and are currently sitting on 2 points at
the bottom of the pile. Is it because of a 'European Curse?', a phrase that I
hear all too commonly when talking about the clubs’ lack of success. No it is
not. City, despite being 3rd in the league, drew 2-2 against 19th-ranked
QPR last Saturday, only being saved by an as-always excellent Sergio Aguero
(for other examples of teams being carried by constant goal-getters, look no
further than Arsenal and Alexis Sanchez). This was not the first time that City
have under-performed in the league this season. Despite the copious amounts of
money that have been spent on transfers and wages in the last 5 years, City
have already fallen 8 points behind leaders Chelsea, and with testing fixtures
against Southampton and Swansea in the coming weeks, the gap may in fact
increase further. Their position in the league is a facade. It exposes the fact
that all of the teams (other than Chelsea and this season’s surprise package
Southampton) have not had the quality to be billed as part of the 'Best League
in the World'.
"Okay Olly,
the teams in England are under-performing, but surely this makes the Premier
League the most exciting and competitive league to watch, therefore making it
the best in the world?" I ask you again to look at the table. If City
and Arsenal continue to drop points as easily as they have in the first 11
weeks of the season, they will not even get close to the amount of points
needed to compete with the likes of Chelsea and Southampton, who have both been
extremely clinical in their first 3 months of the campaign. Despite impressive
early results, I do not believe that West Ham and Swansea have the depth of
squad to compete for the title either. This leaves Chelsea and Southampton to
battle it out for the top spot.
Or does it?
Chelsea have dropped 4 points so far this season, and are
currently that distance clear of Southampton. The Saints have yet to face 5 of
the other 9 teams currently sitting in the top 10, compared to Chelsea who have
yet to face 3 (these teams being Newcastle, Stoke and Southampton themselves,
hardly terrifying fixtures for a team who has failed to win twice in the league
all season). For all fans out there, mark December 28th in your diary. This is
the date that Chelsea may as well be crowned Champions. If Chelsea beat
Southampton on this day, I cannot see the League title going to any other club.
The talk of Chelsea being the second team to ever go unbeaten throughout a
Premier League season is not inconceivable, in my opinion, with their depth in
squad and raw talent, along with a manager that gets the best out of his team
nearly week in week out. However, every team can slip up; that is why football
is exciting to us all. What I am saying is that, based on Chelsea's current
form, they could well have stretched their lead over their nearest contenders
to near double figures before even playing them. And so, The 'Not Best Quality
but Most Competitive League in the World' could easily be decided as little as
3 days after Santa Claus has climbed down the chimney of every household in the
world.
All in all, the label that was once rightly linked with
the Premier League has long gone. The teams are not performing with the quality
or consistency to warrant that title. Look at the league tables in Spain, where,
despite the vast financial superiority of Barcelona and Real Madrid, the top 7
teams are currently separated by 7 points. Look at the German teams, where
despite Bayern's dominance in the league, 3 of the German representatives in
the Champions League are currently top of their groups, with Schalke sitting in
second behind Chelsea. If English teams seriously want to regain their status
as being part of the best league in the world, some serious changes need to be
made. Not with buying more foreign talent. Not by charging fans more for every
ticket they buy so as to improve facilities and keep their players happier with
higher wages. The players simply need to work harder and put more effort into
getting their team as high up the league as they possibly can, exposing every
other teams’ slip-up and weakness. Until then, people that believe that England
still possesses the best league in the world are simply not looking at the
facts.
The best league in the world is an objective statement. Arguably the best way to measure what is the 'best league' is by the number of people watching the league as this measure would represent those interested and exited by a certain league. if you added together the average global audience per game for these leagues—La Liga with 2.2 million (via EPFL-Euroleagues.com), the Bundesliga (via 2012's economic report) with two million and Serie A (via Alessandro Baroncelli and Raul Caruso) with 4.5 million—it still wouldn’t overtake the all-powerful Premier League. This measure is as good as any.
ReplyDeleteThe premier league also has the highest standard of teams. The fact that Man City, Arsenal and Chelsea all beat Germany's top three teams at the weekend and yet will still struggle often against poorer standard teams in the EPL just shows the strength in depth of premier league teams a point which you miss quite spectacularly in the article. The facts confirm that the EPL is the best league in the world.
You can have a temporary dip in form and still be classed as the best. Man City beating Bayern recently only serves to prove as a reminder of the quality still in the premier league.
ReplyDeletearsenal are amazing 2nd in the league man u are rubbis all you have done is criticise the bpl. the bpl is the richest league in the world. we spend the most money. most enjoyable league to watch. best managers in world have some of the best players in world
ReplyDelete