by Harry Purcell
I personally believe that Scotland should remain as a part
of the UK for the following reasons:
1 - If Scotland leaves, then the currency that they will use
will be uncertain. This is because Scottish politicians would want to keep the
pound whereas politicians in London are not keen on the idea. An option that
they could take is to join the euro. However this will mean that their monetary
policy will be controlled by the Frankfurt-based ECB, which could mean that
changes in the monetary policy may not positively affect their economy.
2- If Scotland were to become its own nation, many businesses
may leave the country. There would be economic instability which would arise
from potentially developing its own currency and trying to gain an E.U.
membership. Loss of businesses will decrease the amount of economic activity in
Scotland as there would be fewer jobs available and fewer contributions to
aggregate demand through consumption and investment.
3 - Finally, the UK has a lot, approximately 1.5 trillion by
the time of the vote, of debt owed to foreign countries, some of which Scotland
is responsible for. An agreement would have to be made which could take a long
time. The treasury say that a population split of the UK’s national debt would
leave Scotland a debt of 74% of its GDP. They also estimate that the start-up cost for
Scotland will be approximately £1.5 billion. It is clear that from this it will
be very hard for Scotland to maintain an economy with these costs.
A lot of interesting arguments here - and now for a bit of shameless advertising, if anyone would like to debate this further or challenge any of these views, do come to MUN on Monday in the Willis Room at lunchtime for our Scottish debate!
ReplyDelete