by Will Wallace
So said Plato,
one of the fathers of philosophy. He was, of course, referring to the incredible
power that music can have over those who listen. Music is further described by
Anthony Storr as being able to ‘penetrate the core of our physical being. It
can make us weep or give us intense pleasure’. More recently George Osborne who, during
Baroness Thatcher’s funeral, was photographed crying described this phenomenon
as a ‘very,
very powerful and emotional moment’. Music can have a definite impact on the
listener’s emotions; the question is whether this can have such an effect on an
individual that it influences their political views.
Music can be used as a
means of political participation: Courtney Brown goes so far as to suggest that
music’s potential as a political force has caused ‘a continuation and
possible acceleration of the diminishing role of political parties as
socializing agents and informational pipelines’. At times of war, music has
played a particularly important political role: patriotic music would be used
to glorify soldiers and encourage others to get involved in the war effort, and
on the other hand protest music would provide the opposition with a means of
expressing their stance. One of the most highly regarded choral works of the
twentieth century, Benjamin Britten’s ‘War Requiem’, is noteworthy for its
markedly anti-war associations. The piece was written for the war damaged Coventry
Cathedral, at a time when most new additions to Classical repertoire were
nationalistic and fuelled jingoism. Britten’s work takes the text from a number
of Wilfred Owen’s poems in order to highlight the consequences of military
conflict as being atrocious.
‘What is new [about the contemporary relevance of music as a conveyor of political ideas] is the magnitude of this phenomenon combined with technological advances in the distribution and accessibility of music, minimally affecting hundreds of millions of mostly young adults across nearly all cultures in the world today’.
“For rhythm and harmony penetrate deeply into the
mind and take a most powerful hold on it”
Historically, music has
been used to glorify a nation, unite people behind a nationalist movement and
encourage citizens to support a military campaign. This was particularly true
of continental Europe in the first half of the nineteenth century, as revolutionaries sought to overthrow autocratic rulers and overcome
foreign powers that had occupied their territory. In the twentieth century, music’s
political use became more pronounced, with anti-war and anti-establishment
movements gaining in strength. However the crux of the issue is whether it is
the music itself that impacts the listener, or the political symbolism that has
been evoked by leaders: for example, does ‘I Vow To Thee My Country’ itself
contain musical elements that stir emotions, or is it the association that the
song has been given with British patriotism that creates such a reaction?
The 1960s and 70s saw a flurry of popular songs in
opposition to the Vietnam War, including John Lennon’s 1969 hit ‘Give Peace A
Chance’ and Edwin Starr’s song ‘War (What Is It Good For?)’, which was
popularized by Bruce Springsteen in the 1980s. The music resonated strongly
with younger people, reached high places in the charts and powered many events
and marches in opposition to the United States’ direct involvement in the
18-year conflict. The effectiveness of popular music as a popular force is
explained by Storr as he reasons that ‘the
mnemonic power of music is still evident in modern culture. Many of us remember
of words of songs and poems more accurately than we can remember prose’.
Brown
justifies this point in noting that ‘I have yet to meet and individual who has
memorized the words of any recent speech made by a presidential candidate over
the past few elections’. Other political movements have also used music to
their advantage, including anti-establishment groups in the 1980s (for example,
Sex Pistols’ 1976 song ‘Anarchy in the U.K.’ and ‘God Save the Queen’ in 1977).
Brown analyses the importance of political music in modern culture by saying that:
‘What is new [about the contemporary relevance of music as a conveyor of political ideas] is the magnitude of this phenomenon combined with technological advances in the distribution and accessibility of music, minimally affecting hundreds of millions of mostly young adults across nearly all cultures in the world today’.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.