by John Sadden
This was
the considered verdict of an anonymous PGS pupil in 1898 in an essay, written
in the Detention Room, thought to have been set as a punishment for banging his
desk lid. Perhaps in the same way that a bad workman reputedly blames his
tools, the miffed schoolboy attributes his unfair treatment firmly to his
wooden desk. It was, after all, the desk that made the offending noise.
In the
half-an-hour that was stolen from his life, spent in shameful, unnatural
silence in that Detention Room, the boy controls his despair at being so
ill-treated, draws deeply on that can-do PGS spirit, and proceeds to list his
ideas for improving school desk design. Nobly and selflessly he seeks practical
ways to prevent others suffering his own cruel fate. He concludes that a simple
desk catch would have prevented the lid falling down, breaking the sacred
silence of the classroom and upsetting the Master. His brilliant idea would
also save future schoolboys from the suffering caused by heavy wooden lids
slamming on vulnerable fingers and knuckles.
The anonymous boy is on a roll. He recommends a unique lock for each desk: “The object of having locks is to keep your books, pens, pencils and other necessities from being ‘gone’”. Desks, he argues, should be individual, not shared, bench-style. Seats should be padded and have a shaped back for comfort. In that half an hour, the boy has anticipated the ergonomically designed desks and individual lockers taken for granted today.
Half a
century later, in a piece of post-war creative writing of the type beloved of a
new breed of English teacher, an eight year old Lower School pupil imagines
himself as a desk. But while the detained Victorian schoolboy had ideas
to improve his desk, in this 1946 account, the desk has ideas to improve the
schoolboy:
"I am a single-seater desk
placed in the back of the class, near the window. The first thing I remember
was that a horrid boy woke me up in the morning by banging my lid up and down
to make a noise. He nearly cracked my head, and to increase my discomfort he
stuck some nasty chewing gum on me. I finally got some peace when the teacher
came in. But even he spoilt it by making a boy stand on my seat! In the
dinner-hour the little brute took out a penknife and started to carve his name
upon me. Happily a Prefect caught him before any real damage was done. I hope
he was caned!"
The
physical abuse suffered by the average desk from chewing gum and
penknives was, one imagines, an occupational hazard, and the carving of
one's name an expression of the natural territorial instinct of the
schoolboy. In those innocent days, knives were carried as routinely as
mobile phones today, before whittling was replaced by text-messaging,
twittering and tik-tokking.
Ten
years later, Peter Barnes (OP 1954-64) and his contemporaries added their own
ingenious brand of psychological abuse:
“There was a craze for creating
marble runs inside the desk by arranging books, wooden pencil cases,
geometry set boxes, rulers inside the desk so as to create an
inclined zig-zag route from the top right hand corner where the hole
for the inkwell was down towards the edge closest to the seat. The trick
was to catch the marble as it emerged (from a hole at the front, possibly bored
by a compass point or a penknife) but sometimes it would drop on to the floor
and then there could be trouble.
Today,
such inventiveness would be celebrated for its promotion of problem solving,
touching on several areas of the curriculum, as well as the development of
motor skills in catching that marble.
Another
innovative use of the desk was as a place for pin-ups utilising the underside
of the lid, so that every opening provided the ranks of pupils behind with a
welcome distraction from academic matters. Indeed, the role of the desk in
education, in its broadest sense, may appear to have been neglected, but thanks
to the memories of OPs and occasional accounts in The Portmuthian, we are able
to take a peep under the lid.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.