by Joshua Yuan
Perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of the New
Labour project was not that it has fundamentally reshaped British society, but
rather that it has completely redefined British politics, namely by making its
biggest opponent - The Conservative party more or less the same as itself,
through shifting the political centre ground to the left. When comparing the
Tory party that has outlawed the promotion of homosexuality in 1988 to the Tory
party that has legalised same-sex marriage in 2013, and the Tory party that
openly talked about abolishing the NHS in the early 1990s to the Tory party
that has pledged to increase NHS spending in 2019, it isn’t difficult to grasp
just how utterly radical and transformative New Labour really was.
With Neil Kinnock’s defeat of the Militant
Tendency in 1991, a Troskyist group which aimed to infiltrate the Labour Party,
most people nowadays view the New Labour project spearheaded by Tony Blair
which began in the mid-1990s as a right-wing takeover of the Labour party. Many
have even humorously claimed that Blair was “The best Tory Prime Minister we’ve
ever had!”. This, however, could not be further from the truth. New Labour,
stemming from Eurocommunism (a branch of communism aimed at transforming western
europe socially), although was closely aligned to Thatcherite economic
policies, had arguably the most radical social policies in modern British
history.
Almost immediately after the May 1997
landslide, New Labour launched a constitutional revolution in the UK. The
Scotland Act of 1998 and the Government of Wales Act of 1998 created a Scottish
parliament and a Welsh assembly, with both bodies granted significant
legislative power. This was an assault on the British Constitution, namely the
Acts of Union 1707, and drastically altered the nature of the state,
transforming the UK from a unitary, centralised state to a quasi-federal state.
Although some might argue that these legislations were simply attempts to
combat the rise in separatism in those regions and help preserve the union,
this in reality is not the case as the SNP’s grip on Scotland has only
strengthened since then. Such a dramatic transformation of the nature of the
British state within such a short period of time underpins New Labour’s subversiveness.
Following the dismantling of a unitary
Britain, New Labour introduced an act which would’ve been seen by most as
unthinkable a decade earlier - The Civil Partnership Act of 2004. In modern
British society, same-sex marriage is something that is universally accpeted,
but back in 2004, when not so long ago it was illegal to openly promote
homosexuality in school as a result of Section 28 of the Local Government Act
1988, this piece of legislation was radical. This was part of New Labour’s plan
to fundamentally reshape British society, from one that is predominantly
socially conservative to one that is tolerant, open, and most importantly,
‘progressive’. To back up this claim, a further example is the fact that,
Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Blair, stated that during one of his
meetings in 2000 with Labour leaders, the party elites wanted to “rub the
Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date” by
encouraging mass immigration. Thus, effectively reinforces the point that New Labour
ultimately aimed to completely transform British society.
Finally, the Blairite project has utterly
altered the role of government in British society, and has also fundamentally
changed the relationship between the state and its citizens. New Labour’s
emphasis on the ‘modernisation’ of the NHS eventually resulted in it being
turned into a sort of cult that is being universally worshipped in modern
Britain, and no party would dare to mention cutting the NHS budget in its
manifesto (whereas a decade ago we had free-market Tories urging the end of the
NHS). The project also introduced a national minimum wage, which at the time
was completely revolutionary and controversial. As a result of these policies,
the government was forced into playing a much greater role in society, and the
state was being radically transformed into an enabling one.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.