by Isla Sligo-Young
Recently, certain members of the generation now at university
have acted in such a way that young people now reaching adulthood have been
dubbed the ‘Snowflake Generation’. In part, this name derives from members of
the generation who feel extremely threatened when they hear views and beliefs
that oppose their own, which has led to university campuses having to have an
elongated list of people and groups who are no longer allowed to conduct
speeches.
I am very careful in my description of certain members of a generation, rather than suggesting that the whole generation holds these viewpoints. This is because we are at a turbulent time in history, a period of unforeseen change; for example, the Government being defeated on three votes in the last day has been seismic, bringing a measure of uncertainty and fear into our society. This fear creates the perfect breeding ground for views that are normally those of a minority to be able to take control and try to restore some type of order in this world of chaos by silencing an opposition that may make them question their views.
I am very careful in my description of certain members of a generation, rather than suggesting that the whole generation holds these viewpoints. This is because we are at a turbulent time in history, a period of unforeseen change; for example, the Government being defeated on three votes in the last day has been seismic, bringing a measure of uncertainty and fear into our society. This fear creates the perfect breeding ground for views that are normally those of a minority to be able to take control and try to restore some type of order in this world of chaos by silencing an opposition that may make them question their views.
This censorship of those with a right to express their
views is potentially very dangerous because whichever
group has control of government/society at any given time can further impose their
power over the people by deciding whose speech is classed as offensive. This was showcased at the start of the Communist Revolution in Russia just over 100 years ago: the day after the Bolsheviks took control of Petrograd
and the government, Bourgeois papers and
counterrevolutionary publications were banned from publication. This
ultimately led to complete censorship of every part of Soviet life, even how
people talked to one another- ultimately leading to death for those who did not
agree with the ideology imposed by the government. This is poignantly reflected, today, in the multitude of death threats received by activist who do not
follow the ideology of today’s society, which is predominantly left-wing.
For example, Julie Bindel, who is dubbed a controversial ‘extreme
Feminist’, believes that changing genders is a result of people not wanting to
challenge the expectations of their genders. In 2016, Bindel talked at PGS about
her views and ideology. There must have been people in the audience that
disagreed with her ideas. However, by stimulating debate she may have caused some members of the audience to question their own beliefs, consolidate their ideas or further
develop their opinions for or against her ideology. All these important aspects
of questioning originate from a character who is now labelled ‘transphobic’
and has been banned from talking at many venues including Manchester University.
Finally returning to Soviet
Russia, George Orwell said that ‘If liberty means anything at all, it means the
right to tell people what they do not want to hear.’ This perfectly summarises the importance of
free speech within our society, as freedom is first removed by the absence of
the ability to question, but also power is cemented by choosing who is
definitively right and wrong .
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.