by Katie Sharp
Love it or hate it, the Eurovision Song Contest is one of
the biggest international events. The 2016 Contest in Stockholm saw 204 million
watchers around Europe (and Australia), making it the most watched event of the
night in the majority of the countries taking part.
The Eurovision Song Contest (originally Eurovision Grand
Prix) was created in 1956 in Switzerland to try to unify war-torn Europe
through light entertainment, as it would give the countries in Europe a shared
low-stakes event to compete against each other at.
However, owing to its international popularity, there are
controversies surrounding the contest- particularly about politics. It is often
argued that it isn't a competition of music, instead competition of who is
popular and unpopular in Europe. Terry Wogan, the UK’s former presenter of
Eurovision, stepped down from his role in 2008, saying “The voting used to be about the songs. Now it’s about national
prejudices. We (the UK) are on our own. We had a very good song, a very good
singer, we came joint last. I don’t want to be presiding over another debacle.”
After the UK’s involvement in the Iraq War from 2003, the UK has failed to
score very highly, entering the top 10 only once, in 2009. While it could be
that the quality of the British contestants is the cause of this, it is most
likely a result of the UK’s unpopularity in Europe after the invasion of Iraq,
as shown by the UK receiving its first “nul points” in 2003, immediately after
the beginning of the Iraq war.
The effect of politics is also shown in the “voting blocs”,
where competing countries form alliances to vote for each other. These voting
blocs were so influential that in 2009, national juries were introduced
alongside the televote, providing 50% of the points for each country. However,
the voting blocs are still recognised in Eurovision, as during the presentation
of votes there is often booing from the crowd, particularly during the former
USSR countries’ votes.
Another controversy surrounding Eurovision is the
introduction of the “Big Five” (originally the “Big Four” until Italy competed
in 2010 after a fourteen year absence) in 2000, which is five countries-
consisting of the UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy- that don't have to
compete in the semi-finals to earn a place in the final. These countries, as
the biggest financial contributors to the European Broadcasting Union (which
produces Eurovision), automatically progress to the final. This is particularly
controversial as many feel that these countries are paying to be in the final,
whereas smaller and poorer countries must work hard and be popular to be in the
final. This is shown in the generally low scores for the Big Five, and there
has only been one contestant from the Big Five- Lena, for Germany- to have won
the contest since the automatic qualification to the final.
It could be argued that the idea of Eurovision celebrating
different cultures and allowing countries to show off their heritage is no
longer true as almost all of the songs are sung in English- in 2017, only 4
songs in the contest were entirely in languages other than English. This is
often because songs that aren't in English typically score less than English
language songs (though the winning song of ESC 2017 was Portuguese, breaking
this trend).
The 2017 Contest in Kiev also involved Russia withdrawing
from the competition, as the Russian contestant, Julia Samoylova, was issued a
ban from entering Ukraine after she was selected as the Russian entry, as she
had illegally entered Crimea through Russia in 2015. The Director General of
the EBU criticised Ukraine’s actions, saying that Ukraine was “abusing the Contest for political reasons”.
However, while Eurovision may be full of politics and
controversies, it is still just a song competition, full of cheesy songs and
unnecessary pyrotechnics and bizarre costumes- which is what the Eurovision
Song Contest is really about. So, here is the interval act from the 2016
contest, which shows how to make a successful Eurovision song, complete with
contestants from the years before.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.