by Cicely Podmore
In the western world,
we maintain a particularly selfish view of our own property. This can easily be
attributed to the constant investment which our homes demand with extortionate
housing prices, mortgage
burdens, renovation expenses, decoration fees, maintenance
costs... In the current housing market, where house prices rose by 5.8pc in
2016, there persists a feeling that something so hard earned should be kept to
oneself. And because they are so precious to us, we protect them, installing
locks and alarms to keep them safe, but also, consequently keeping others out.
In past decades, it was not uncommon for neighbours to pop into each others'
open doors. Nonetheless, a recent survey has reported that 1 in 3 Britons
cannot name even one of their neighbours.
What's more, we have a
growing homelessness crisis in Great Britain, with the figure of people living
on the streets exceeding a quarter of a million at the end of last year. Whilst
other countries are obliged to offer housing to every citizen (the Netherlands,
the Seychelles, and even developing countries in Latin America such as
Argentina, Columbia, and Uruguay), Great Britain has no such promise of
accommodation. One of last week's news stories, about the removal of a group of
squatters occupying an empty London property, struck me in its unfairness. By
no means am I in favour of breaking into houses with malicious intent, but
finding shelter in an unused home instead of suffering these inhospitable
winter nights (often sub-zero in temperature) merely seems like common sense.
It was disappointing to hear of the owner's fury on being informed of these
squatters, instead of investing some of his vast sums of money (he is a Russian
oligarch) into helping solve this issue.
In places where houses
are smaller, less valuable and empty of consumer objects, it is noticeable how
warm heartedly you are welcomed inside. My mother has often fondly recounted
stories of her trip to India where it is considered rude to enter a house and
not accept a cup of tea. Additionally, having recently started learning
Russian, my teacher has told me how a Russian person will never speak across
their doorframe, instead ushering their guest inside immediately. Whilst this
is certainly due to the practical reason of avoiding lost heat in Russia's
climate, it is also a demonstration of friendliness and generosity.
Whilst looking for ways
to Interrail on a budget this summer holiday, my friends and I have explored
the website 'www.couchsurfer.com' which offers rent-free accommodation, staying with your host as
you would with a friend. This site seems uncharacteristically welcoming and is
therefore very appealing. Indeed, The Guardian has written an article about one
man who offers his home both for free on 'couchsurfer.com' and for a fee on 'AirBnb.' He explains that he would rather that
his guests stayed via 'couchsurfer.com' by describing how it is a demonstration of people 'putting
themselves out there at the whim of human kindness in a way most of us stop
doing as adults.'
The increasing trend of
isolationism in the west, from shutting ourselves off from the European Union,
to the USA shutting out immigrants, to shutting ourselves inside our own homes
is lessening human interaction and consequently damaging human relations. It
may be an ambitious assertion to make, but I believe that our closed doors are
a large factor towards the recent, drastically divided, political opinions in
Britain and America. Where interaction is absent, we grow more and more
dissimilar in our views. Whether it be open borders or open doors, a welcoming
policy is always the kindest.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.