by Charlotte Phillips
In a book full of astonishing statistics,
thought provoking ideas and solid science, Cordelia Fine coherently puts
forward a world where we treat men and women equally- and she has the evidence
to prove why we should. Fine manages to combine intellectual and accessible
with great skill, adding interest and fun with occasional snaps of her sharp
wit in amongst the research studies. I encourage anyone with even a vague
interest in biology, sociology, neuroscience, psychology, or just our place in
the world to read this book. You will not be disappointed
Despite the suggested neurological and biological focus
of the tag line of Cordelia Fine's game-changing book Delusions of Gender ('The
Real Science Behind Sex Differences'), her extended study of the ways in which
the male and female brain differ (or, more often, do not) draws on multiple
areas including psychology, sociology, politics, history and pure science. The
book, published in 2010, has more academic references than any publication I
have ever come across before, all used in order to debunk the myth that gender
differences are an inevitable part of our 'hardwiring'.
The overriding message of the book, recurring repeatedly
throughout the thought-provokingly named chapters, is that the relatively new
idea of 'biological essentialism' as a reason for innate gender differences in
behaviour and skills is based upon sketchy evidence found from technologies
which are only in their infancy. Biological essentialism, as Fine explains in
her concise and sophisticated tone, is the concept that it is our biology that
causes innate personality differences- that our genes determine our
preferences, tastes and attitudes. A number of popular 'science' novels have
drawn on this shaky theory to further spread the message that conforming to
gender stereotypes is an inevitable part of life. Fine destroys these
assumptions with reams of academically acclaimed and proven evidence, which
although can make the book feel a little like periodically reading the
reference pages of a biological journal, is no doubt impressive.
The book is split into three sections, each building on
the evidence provided in the one before to construct the logical conclusion
that it is overwhelming socialisation that leads to the majority of gender differences,
rather than genetic factors. One of the most resounding examples of this is the
discussion about 'gender neutral' parenting. Fine argues against the many
parents who say they have tried to raise their children free of gender
influences- pink and blue toys, play cooking stoves and play guns. Without
discrediting these parent's efforts, Fine points out that gender neutrality is
much harder to achieve than it seems on the surface. Gender neutral parenting
means splitting all domestic and child caring tasks exactly 50/50- cooking,
washing, cleaning, nappy changing.
Books must be hand-revised to change all
pronouns to 'they' rather than he or she, along with the pictures. This may
sound drastic but this is just the tip of the iceberg- and these are only measures
you can implement in your own home. More must be done to ensure a more gender
neutral society, Fine explains- because how else are we going to encourage
girls to think it's normal to go into science, politics or engineering? And,
for that matter, how are we going to encourage boys to think it's normal to
take up a profession as a therapist, secretary, or cleaner?
Excellent review of an excellent book. This is a really important topic to talk about, because public perception - and indeed the work of some scientists - is so far from the verifiable facts, as set out by Fine. And important because gender stereotyping has a huge impact on the ability of all people to fulfil their potential, male or female.
ReplyDeleteIf you want some further reading which takes you deeper into the science with a meta-analysis of most published research on gender difference (but with fewer jokes than Cordelia's!) you might like Rebecca Jordan-Young's book, "Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences".