by Isabel Stark
|
Film, for me, is the most interesting of
mediums. The ability for creative minds take flat words and mould them into
moving objects fascinates me. The whole process is much trickier than it
appears. I first started my drama career at the tender age of 2, making an
appearance as the Virgin Mary in a two-girl play with my then-4-year old sister.
I then started starring in some of my sister's films – I starred as ‘Eloise’ the
six year old who lives in the penthouse suit of ‘the Plaza Hotel in New York
City with her Nanny, her pug dog Weenie, and her turtle Skipperdee.’ I then
progressed to star in the original film ‘Isabel Poirot’ (Poirot’s niece), scripted, directed, shot and acted by Louisa Stark. It’s fair to say I’ve had
my fair share of dramatic experiences. We often made short films when our
friends came over – it was a luxury to have more than three people and the
opposite gender available. Anyway, I know a little of the struggle trying to
make something fulfilling and stylish in this medium; that is why I would like to take this time to
congratulate (two years too late) Gia Coppola for her first film, Palo Alto.
Palo Alto. Alas, I do not have the skill to
articulate my feelings towards this film in a way which mirrors its stylistic
quality and coolness. Released two years ago, it’s
been around for a while; however, being a small, wildly indie film there was
little publication and screening despite it being a Gia Coppola film (actually
her first film). Yes, the Coppola dynasty
continues. Francis Ford is her grandfather, Sophia her aunt, Nicolas Cage her
aunt’s cousin. This cinematic royal was coupled
with James Franco. The film is based on Franco’s book by the same name; the
book is a collection of short, intertwining stories about students at Palo Alto High School- all semi-fictitious, yet with an underlying core of reality drawn
from Franco’s own teenage experiences. I have the
utmost admiration for Franco and his book despite it being brushed off as “the
work of an ambitious young man who clearly loves to read, who has a good eye
for detail, but who has spent way too much time on style and virtually none on
substance.” Coppola manages to retain this style
which is intrinsic to the book. She uses flat-palette backgrounds. Her costumes
exhume hipness. The lead, Jack Kilmer, was refreshingly actually the same age as
his character, Teddy, when cast (his first acting role) aged 17.
I struggle to see how Coppola managed to create such a stylised film, but still to maintain naturalism and realism. Not much happens within the film, but that is the quality which gives it the authenticity Franco was ultimately
striving for. This perhaps makes the naturalism prominent over style. The film
revolves around Teddy and April and their two different social circles within
school but at the heart is a muted and dulled will- they-won’t-they relationship. Palo Alto is constantly on the verge of something happening; however, it floats along, echoing the teens’ lives and empty dreams. Without
turning into a fly-on-the-wall documentary, this was about as close to the realm
of reality a film can get.
The film portrays smoking, excessive drinking, sex
and drug taking. Not idealised in any way is the behaviour of these characters, but it showed an "edgy" authenticity lacking in mainstream British cinema. It is for this reason I found this small scale film satisfying- it conveyed
true emotions and true feelings that the average teenager is exposed to in this
day and age. Societies of course vary and even though we are united (the United
States and Britain) by the same development levels and a common language, we
still have fundamentally different experiences none more so than that of the
traditional British public school versus a liberal Californian high school. Girls’
soccer, the general architecture and the community court are some of the
few major differences that could alienate us British teens from this film. However, the differences are not made more alien to us like some high school teen US
movies by showing some intangible story line of the nerd trying to get the head
cheerleader/jock played by some 20- something model; instead, in Palo Alto, the flawed
become relatable to us.
The party scene is one which is (some may say
sadly) relatable to most teenagers in the Western world. The
bored yet raging teenage emotions are shown aptly through Die Antwoord’s “Enter
the Ninja”, yet the slow motion technique Coppola employs here creates a tension. There is
a tension between fast paced synth music juxtaposing the slow moving film but
also there is a tension between the tempo of adolescent thoughts. Partying and
freedom are placed alongside the reality of growing up and, eventually, life
choices. There is a precarious balance between these two, which is a hard-biting
point to master and this is explored truthfully throughout this film. The
dilemmas and choices -the limbo world between teenager and adult the characters
face - ricochets into my own life. Making choices which seem life-defining for me
is a hard transition stage from child into adulthood, for this reason I have
never felt more connected to this film. The open ending echoes the moral of the
story. Life is an open road which is for
better and for worse; drive how you want down it, so to speak.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.