by Filippa Furniss
(source: Wiki Commons) |
Stephen Fry represents all that is British culture,
intelligence and intellect. As a broadcaster, comedian, writer, presenter,
actor, Fry has managed to integrate his timeless humour, and vast knowledge
into infinite aspects of media for the better part of the last 30 years. An all-time favourite pastime of mine happens to be watching a horrifying number of QI
episodes back to back on a Sunday, so I feel as if I’m quite well acquainted
with Mr Fry by this point.
It may be this family-friendly, good humoured way in which
Fry presents himself that shocked the world last week, as his new book More
Fool Me was published. In this third instalment of his autobiographies, more of Stephen’s
past is revealed in a very personal manner. His struggles with depression and
bi-polarity are further examined and discussed, exposing Fry to the whole world
to see. However, the issue which I wish to grasp upon is the matter of drug abuse,
which Fry discusses openly for the first time.
More Fool Me reveals the depth of drug abuse, involving
cocaine, which Stephen Fry plummeted into the late 80s. Fry discusses how it
helped him to ease some of the darker moments of his depression, but quickly
turned into no more than a hobby. In the past few weeks, Fry has faced much
abuse from the media regarding to his past habits, which I feel raises an
important question:
Is prosecution still valid to somebody who has abused drugs
in the past?
What do I think? No.
What does the law think? It depends.
Up front, this may seem like an irrational and abrupt
answer. Surely drug abusers must be arrested and prosecuted for their past
crime? This is the basis for the query that I am raising. Throughout the media,
we have hundreds of celebrities, such as Fry, discussing their pasts of abusing
cocaine and other Class A substances. But why are these people not prosecuted?
They have committed a crime, and are now essentially admitting to it. Surely
this requires the standard jail time that can stretch up to decades? The Law,
however, thinks differently. Upon doing my research, I was amazed that there is
no law on past drug abusers. To summarise it simply (and I apologise to any
qualified personal for my horrendously vague summarisation), it comes down to
the police involved in each case as to how severe, if any, prosecutions are
when the drug abuse has been in the past.
Personally, I feel that this seems unfair on those
individuals involved in these cases. The abusers themselves have no power as to
how the police react, regardless as to whether they committed the crime 10
years ago, or last Wednesday. This is very much why I feel that past drug abuse
should have a set time limit on it, and once this number of years have passed,
then the individual does not meet arrest, but rather support for tackling addiction.
Stephen Fry is a perfect example of this. More Fool Me speaks out to the world about his past struggle with his cocaine addiction. The
key word in that sentence is past.
The law is primarily written to protect its people, and to keep us safe. Drug
abuse is therefore a crime for the clear reason that these substances are
harmful to us! So why, therefore, should somebody who has overcome these addictions,
somebody who has conquered a dark part of their life, now be prosecuted for
their past actions?
Obviously, I am making a sweeping generalisation here, however
the strong emphasis needs to be placed on support, rather than punishment. Our
society focuses so strongly on rectifying the blips through prosecution, rather
than support for addiction, that almost 60% of abusers relapse after serving
their sentences. The UKDPC (UK Drug Policy Commission) are currently revamping
their support and treatment for offenders, helping to tackle this issue through
Britain.
To me, Stephen Fry is still a role model. He was able to
overcome a very dark and draining part of his life, and is relating to people
all across the world that also suffer from bi-polar and depressive mental
illnesses. Through his book, not only has Fry been able to raise awareness over
his mental illnesses, but also the struggle of addiction and how support is the
absolute necessity to overcome this.
Here is the video clip of Stephen Fry briefly discussing
his book:
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments with names are more likely to be published.