Saturday, 12 January 2013

Windows 8: Worth Your Money?

by William Bates

Windows 8 is the latest operation system (ie. Windows version) from Microsoft.  Installation of Windows 8 is quick and easy and takes less than an hour. It is based on large buttons designed with touchscreens in mind but cumbersome and obstructive when using a mouse. Your older desktop programs show on the new start page that replaces the start button : but then opens unceremoniously in the desktop. You have to use Window's recommended user account control settings or you will not be able to use the app store or indeed some ‘Apps’ unless you turn it on. This okay for families on a shared computer but not when an adult wants to monitor but not restrict what their older child does on their personal computer

Despite making huge changes graphically, essentially Windows 8 is a touchscreen version on Windows 7 , with no changes to Paint, Notepad , WordPad , Sound Recorder or even the Calculator , which has not changed much since I was using windows 98. In this review I will look at its features and see whether, at £40, it's worth your money.

Media-wise Windows 8 for computers powered by AMD or Intel CPU's use the same old versions of Windows Media Player and Windows Media Center which, as in Windows Vista and Windows 7 will not come in the cheaper Windows 8 Starter (Which only comes on netbooks in the UK).  I would suggest the free VLC media player. Switching between the 'Metro' and 'Desktop' Modes is awkward and can happen by accident. Windows 8 struggled to work with many older programs and the Windows 8 RT Edition which comes on tablet PC's powered by ARM (Most of them)  as opposed to AMD or Intel will not run any old Windows programs or include the desktop mode. This only has a few programs so far.

The charms bar is activated by 'swiping' your finger across the top right of the screen or (as I did)  strange witchcraft with your mouse. This enables you to 'Search' for programs. This replaces the listing system of Windows Start Menu. It also gives you ‘Share’ and 'Devices' buttons as well as  'Settings' which links to the control panel and the Personalisation menu (not in Starter Edition).

One of the best changes Windows 8 makes is introducing the ribbon interface from Microsoft Office to Windows Explorer (AKA My Computer , My Documents etc.) allowing you to easily share, email, fax or burn to disc (DVD , CD , BLU-RAY) . However, you may have noticed something else has changed. Remember those pretty 'Areo' effects which meant all of the windows were slightly see-though? These have been removed in the interests of making Windows 8 work on no more powerful computers than the ones that were needed for vista. That means that anybody on Vista or Windows 7 could run this on their current machines, as could most XP users; but without a touch screen would you want to?

In the words of Steve Jobs ,"We've done tons of user testing on this, and it turns out it doesn't work. Touch surfaces don't want to be vertical…after a short period of time, you start to fatigue and after an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off. It doesn't work; it's ergonomically terrible."

(screenshots provided by William Bates)


  1. Missed out performance increase which is arguably the most important upgrade in some peoples minds and task manager upgrade. Compatibility is a non issue for the majority of stuff.

  2. Hi

    Thank you for your comment,

    I think that in many respects Windows 8 is slower than Windows 7 in almost
    all scenarios. This is because despite being technically faster it is slower to navigate through the new (formerly known as 'metro') interface as it is clunky and noticeably laggy to load compared to the start menu. As you do not have cascading lists you have to scroll through all of your programs. As this is one of the most commonly used functions it means Windows 8 is in effect slower for desktop users. As most tablets are basic they are often slower than the laptops they replace and often run the stripped out Windows 8 rt.

  3. 2. you can hardly call compatibility a non-issue.In many countries such as china it is important to keep requirements low as most users use refurbished or low spec machines. This is the biggest growth area for PC sales and in africa specs are even worse

  4. It's an upgrade on 7, when compare Vista to Xp!

  5. at 40 pounds i dont think i would buy it

  6. Only get odd numbers of windows


Comments with names are more likely to be published.